I went 11.90's-12.20's pretty consistently. I ran a 12.55 missing 4th and still went faster than you. It's pretty safe to say who is faster. And don't make any exuses, the MPH tells a lot that you seriously need to practice driving cuz your traps are waaay off. I still have the car if you want to run them. :bleh:

You..13.70's... lol




Your fastest 13.20's with a string of mid 13's inbetween.

The mach is his wife's car and I see her drive it to work a lot. It moves more than people think but it doesn't really go any where except work and back.

Wait a second here, pancho...you said the cars were faster than my car....

...but now you are comparing my driving to your driving? Make up your damn mind on what you want to compare old man.

:driver:

Your car is only as fast as you can drive it. So he is right on that account, its not your car's fault your a shitty driver. :driver:

Well how the hell is you car going to move if you don't drive it? lol.

What happened to all that talk about experience behind the wheel? Y'all harp on that SOOOO much that it accounts to almost every point you try to make here. I have no experience drag racing, versus Steve's 20 years experience on me, so yeah, I would hope he can drive better in the 1/4 than I can, because I've only done it once. And I know I suck at it.

You're just going bat shit crazy now. You must be inhaling those old man Cadillac fumes now.

Mechanical engineering thinking for you. Still won't concede he is slower because in mechanical theory his car might be faster with another driver who would never be driving his car in the first place. :rofl:

Not at all. I'm not talking about the Grandpa car here, I'm talking Stang on Stang violence. Your argument is ridiculous, you know it, so you're being defensive.

Who's a mechanical engineer here? Not me.

You might want to reread. I clearly said I sucked. Isn't that what you are after in the end? For the other party to "give in" and admit the truth? If I had as many years behind the wheel racing and such as you do, and I did it a lot more often than I do know, I'm sure I would be a better driver at going down the 1320.

God, you can't understand anything. I wasn't trying to talk about Caddy versus Stang. You are trying to make it seems that way to help support your troll. I was mearly making a joke that you are now going crazy like an old man.

You edited that while I was responding. :bleh:


So, since you suck at driving (self admitted), both of the Stangs here have been faster than you, is it not safe to say your car is slower?

Reread that post you quoted a minute ago, because you got a quote in before I finished editing it.

Just by replying, I'm "going crazy"? lol. My God you are sensitive.

I'm sure John Force could run a better time with his car as well but I don't see that happening. If you can't get your car down the track or road faster than the next guy your car is slower. It doesn't matter if its your fault because you have the driving skills of a 16 year old Asian girl. It still lost so its still slower.

No, it's safe to say I am slower.

If I drove your car, and I ran a slower ET and MPH than I did in my car, would that now mean that your car is slower than mine??

It was just a joke. No sensitivity about it. I was trying to have some fun. That is all. You know the old man Cadillac jokes will start coming out. I was just trying to get one while I could.

Your missing the point a car is only as fast as the driver. It really has nothing to do with the car. I've seen 1300 hp cars go slower than a 700hp car in the 1/4. If the driver can't get it down the track then yes the car was slower. Power doesn't mean everything in a race.

Forgot to fix that too. :crazy:

Oh no he is old that is why he bought the Caddy. I think when you hit 40 its a mandatory buy. That and old man pants with suspenders. :banana-mario:

Yeah, that means that the driver sucks. Doesn't mean the car sucks. A car CAN BE slower than another car, but that doesn't mean it definitely is. You guys use words in way too loose of a termonology. But I know that you know exactly how you are using them

Isn't the whole argument of "a driver mod" the point of saying that guys sucks at driving? Does a baseball player blame his bat when he can't hit a ball? No. That's the exact some argument here. A car can't be held accountable for the short coming of the person operating it, so therefore the car isn't slower because the driver can't drive. It just means that the driver sucks. Nothing is wrong with the car.

Then where is your Caddy? :p

Steve and Derek go sit in the corner. You're both in timeout :)

-Alex

Hey, I'm having fun here. I'm just trying to get them to finally see that even with their stupid trolling arguments, they are stupid arguments.

Let me highlight that. Was =/= is.

Steve's cars have been faster than mine. I won't deny that. And until I get more practice driving the 1/4, those cars will probably continue to go than mine.

How do we know the car is faster, its never been faster. I know its the drivers fault but until the car does it we don't know if its faster.

Read the post above.

What you said there at the end is completely correct. But it's both sides of the argument. Just because it hasn't been faster doesn't mean it ISN'T faster. It just has never been faster. Doesn't mean it won't at some point in time.

LMAO!!

:pp:

I was making them before anyone. I've been looking for a reason to start my midlife crisis! lol

Exactly.

Now that your car is making more power, you need to run Grandpa. :driver:

He isn't going that direction with his midlife. He is going Vette. Not only is he old, but impotent too!

I can put you in time out if you like...:bleh:

Get outta here with that logic stuff mister!

:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::r ofl::gayfight:

This example might cause a shit storm, but oh well.

I believe God exists. However, I cannot directly prove that he does.

Athiests do not believe God exists. However, they cannot directly prove that he doesn't.

So until either side is proven wrong, an argument against either statement is invalid.

Letting your gay side come out there?

Keep it coming, I'm having fun. I know you are doing this for fun, and I'm not getting riled up about it. I'm just trying to show you that this argument isn't even a valid argument to troll with because it doesn't make sense.

Well, you took the fun right out of this conversation. I'm not going there with the religious stuff. As far as racing goes, you can continue on believing your delusional thought process because not only is it crazy, it's hilarious.

I told you I knew it would cause something. I wasn't trying to take it there with religion. I was just using that as an example statement.

I don't believe I (the driver) am faster than you behind the wheel. Doesn't mean I can't ever, or won't be ever be. Do you get that much? that's all I was trying to say this whole time. Right now, yes I drive much slower. But who knows how I will be when I'm 40 too?

I guess you should stop believing in god, since he never answers your prayers on having a fast car. I'm sorry, your prayers on being able to drive your car like its fast. God, god is suck a dick isn't he.

Not sure if you are actually trying to be a dick here or not, Donnie. Or if this is your way at trying to be funny. Who said anything about praying? And who the fuck are you to tell me if I shoudl stop believing in God?

If I pray to be a better/faster driver, then my priorities in life are seriously messed up. I have much more important things I could ask for than trying to prove how fast I can drive a 1/4.

My pop's bought his first Vette at 28, my wife got hers at 29 and me at 31... its not our fault we know what's the best car before we turn 60. :)

:pokeowned:

It's ok, I'm used to the back. I like pacing myself