Check this Out!
 

Not a bad looking 2014 mustang yea?
Attachment 1067
Attachment 1068

What the fuck is that?!?

Please go burn that immediately.

Where is that?

Whaaaa you don't like it? It's a company that retro fits just about any body style mustang you would want on a current chassis. Correct me if I'm wrong but I think it is styled to look like a 1970 mustang....on a brembo car...awesome?

They sure did a pretty crappy job with the tail lights.

those are horrible views. I have seen another pic of it and it looks horrible the proportions are all off.

I'd have to see something like that in person in order to see fit and finish to tell if I liked it or not. I really like restomods if they are done well.

That's trying to be a '69. I thought those taillights were photoshopped at first, until I saw they sucked equally as bad on both sides.

I have two observations about this. One - I bet it is very expensive. Two - It should die in a tire fire.

That caliber of work has no place in high end customs.

I always wondered what spilt fuck looked like. Now I know

A swing and a miss.

-Alex

Haha!

Very bad '69 imitation with some ugly ass tail lights. For what this monstrosity cost I bet one could find an actual '69 and stick a Coyote crate motor in it for less.

I did not see even two body panels correctly aligned.

ROFL!!! :flipthebird:

It was at Cars as Coffee last week. It looked just as weird/fugly in person.

Here's a link to the company that builds these "things": http://www.retrobuilt.com

Here's a pic of their latest work on a 2013 S197:
http://silodrome.com/wp-content/uplo...astback-fd.jpghttp://silodrome.com/wp-content/uplo...astback-fd.jpg
http://silodrome.com/wp-content/uplo...astback-fd.jpg

Just looks goofy to me, but, to each their own, I guess...

I remember seeing this one. This is a little more easy to look at, but the proportion of the roof and fastback are just off.

Wish they would concentrated more time and effort on the tail lights, because that design and implementation sucks.

And the front fenders need to be reworked.

Those cars are hideous. Saw one at c&c. The tail lights appear to be from the 05-09 mustang with special rings over them. Either have a new one or have an old one; don't do both.

Since they are doing a custom rear bumper, you'd think they'd procure some repro tail lights from the correct year to help make it look more authentic...of course those may not fit at all.

Looks like an Oklahoma plate on that orange car. Feels like someone just took a shit in my eyes.

-Alex

I think so. In this video, the guy says he is from Oklahoma and the tail lights are from a '69.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l9yXj1DgoV0

THe rear is just shit.

Wow. The orange car is terrible.

It's one of those things meant for people with more money than sense. There is no way you can take a 2014 and make it look like something made 40-50 years ago.

I like the fact that the idea could be there when new meets old. I have seen similar projects on a corvette where the front shows it to be a newer body style but when looking at the rear of the car it shows you the classic look and vice versa. The rear could be done better but then again, how much are you spending for this conversion?

I also noticed something else, now tell me this....is it just me or do you also notice the front tires being Bigger than the rear? Ummm....???

Do a Resto-mod the correct way. Take a complete roller car that's just a body and frame, and go from there. I've much rather have an original body, or reproduction body, and have to spend the time to make the interior fit rather than make the exterior fit.

It's an allusion. The rear fenders aren't as big as they should be.

It might be an illlusion, but I found the straight on side shot and they still look bigger in the front. Weird.

there was a dude a long time ago that did this but it was a red car. looked damn good too. that yellow car just isnt doing it for me. needs quarter windows.