Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club

Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club (http://www.dfw50s.com/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://www.dfw50s.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   The 2015 S550 numbers are out! And it aint good! (http://www.dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=4592)

saunupe1911 09-17-2014 02:19 PM

The 2015 S550 numbers are out! And it aint good!
 
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...gt_first_test/

Bottom line, keep your current Coyote GT.

BlackStang08 09-17-2014 02:34 PM

I wouldn't be so quick. The guy who wrote that article seems a little biased to the "older" stang. Maybe he has one, lol.

saunupe1911 09-17-2014 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackStang08 (Post 74737)
I wouldn't be so quick. The guy who wrote that article seems a little biased to the "older" stang. Maybe he has one, lol.

Read C&D and R&T as well. The car is even more M4 (german) like than ever. Every acceleration test is slower as well. The only thing they rave about is the comfort and poise of the IRS. I'm sure other performance variants and the DI Coyotes will be better. But this 2015 model is not worth buying if you currently have a Coyote. They took a step back performance numbers wise in every category except lateral G

62nalide 09-17-2014 04:00 PM

How is it slower? Its trapping more MPH.....
What gears are in it?

Grandpa 09-17-2014 04:01 PM

It could be a second faster and 10k cheaper and I still wouldn't buy one. They are uggggggly!

saunupe1911 09-17-2014 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 62nalide (Post 74766)
How is it slower? Its trapping more MPH.....
What gears are in it?

Not sure....where did you see it trapping faster. The quarter and 0 to 60 .2 slower in every publication.

62nalide 09-17-2014 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saunupe1911 (Post 74783)
Not sure....where did you see it trapping faster. The quarter and 0 to 60 .2 slower in every publication.

Where it tells the ET it trapped higher mphs then the older coyote

saunupe1911 09-17-2014 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 62nalide (Post 74784)
Where it tells the ET it trapped higher mphs then the older coyote

Well that's on MT 4.4/ 12.8 run. Others are slower. No one has hit 4.3 /12.7 like 2011-2014 tests

62nalide 09-17-2014 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saunupe1911 (Post 74788)
Well that's on MT 4.4/ 12.8 run. Others are slower. No one has hit 4.3 /12.7 like 2011-2014 tests

Yes but if its trapping more MPH there's traction problems. I can honestly see 12.50s 100% stock with a good driver and track prep.

No one really looks at 0 to 60 for performance in the racing world. More of MPH and ETs and 60fts.

saunupe1911 09-17-2014 06:26 PM

Yeah but publications dont test for all that. I'm talking street wise. This car will not do 12.5 smh. But lets say it did on perfect conditions... A current coyote should do 12.3 then

BlackStang08 09-17-2014 06:30 PM

I want to see one tuned. With all the additions to the engine it should make more power.

Dominic Toretto 09-17-2014 10:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grandpa (Post 74767)
It could be a second faster and 10k cheaper and I still wouldn't buy one. They are uggggggly!

What he said.

-Alex

BLK2012GT 09-17-2014 10:40 PM

Still getting a GT350

Soulowd 09-17-2014 10:46 PM

Yep multiple sources saying slightly slower because she's heavier by nearly 200lbs

garner 09-17-2014 11:37 PM

Just the addition of cooled seats makes me really want it. But at $40k for an ecoboost coupe and $44k for the vert, no thanks


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.