Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club

Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club (http://www.dfw50s.com/index.php)
-   Pics & Video (http://www.dfw50s.com/forumdisplay.php?f=33)
-   -   Red HPP tuned Gt500 vs blown 5.0 (http://www.dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=2776)

Junkie 09-26-2013 09:34 PM

I already ran Johns FD, got drug.

downtime! 09-26-2013 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junkie (Post 51611)
I already ran Johns FD, got drug.

Caddy or Viper?

STROKD 09-26-2013 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maxpayne (Post 51599)
That's a pretty good vid.

When seeing cars like this, I always wonder how much power and torque is enough. I had a civic SI and it made 197 hp at the flywheel. When I first got it, I thought it was the fastest thing ever. Then, I got used to it and got a wrx with 265 hp. I thought damn, this thing is fast. Got used to it and wanted more. Then I got a 5.0 with 420 hp and haven't got more power hungry yet. But, I see these guys and wonder if they ever get tired of 650 to 700 horses and want more (800+). It's a freaking viscous cycle. Lol.

700-800 with good gears is really enough imo. I never got tired of driving my fox with it around 750. It could have gone on a diet, but I never cared because I liked my stereo and it was plenty fast.

I changed it up because I thought the car was eventually going to CA and it was too m'f'in loud with the supercharger. The turbos and mild turbo cam lope would have made the car a lot less obvious that it was fast. It should make a little more power than it did hopefully, went with a smaller motor because I found it cheap used, but did more work to the heads to hopefully compensate for the -40 CID I lost. If it makes 800 rw on 93 octane with no methanol help and weighs about 3200 lbs with me in the car, it should be enough to still have fun with imo.

Junkie 09-27-2013 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by downtime! (Post 51613)
Caddy or Viper?

Viper. CTS-V was/is much faster.

downtime! 09-27-2013 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junkie (Post 51617)
Viper. CTS-V was/is much faster.

That's what I was thinking, just needed to be sure. You know, in case I run across him out and about somewhere.

re-rx7 09-27-2013 02:12 PM

Sergio's supray is quick.

STROKD 09-27-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by re-rx7 (Post 51647)
Sergio's supray is quick.

Compared to your Stang it is. I don't think he's won one race against any of my friends.

re-rx7 09-27-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STROKD (Post 51655)
Compared to your Stang it is. I don't think he's won one race against any of my friends.

:33: Your friends must be so awesome. Never really claimed my car is fast though?

Grandpa 09-27-2013 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by re-rx7 (Post 51658)
:33: Your friends must be so awesome. Never really claimed my car is fast though?

He didn't say you did. He made a simple comparison.

re-rx7 09-27-2013 04:21 PM

I could have swore sergios Supra was white?

STROKD 09-27-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT (Post 51660)
He didn't say you did. He made a simple comparison.

Lmfao, exactly.

Sergio's car seems fast to you "re-rx7", but it isn't really. I never said you said your car was fast.

And yes, my friends are awesome. More awesome than Sergio's car anyway.:jester:

re-rx7 09-27-2013 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by STROKD (Post 51662)
Lmfao, exactly.

Sergio's car seems fast to you "re-rx7", but it isn't really. I never said you said your car was fast.

And yes, my friends are awesome. More awesome than Sergio's car anyway.:jester:

Its an old Supra was a 7m. Pretty quick given the circumstances. Fast is relative anyways. MAybe I should have worded it as " for what the car is, it is quick"? Would that have suited you and your fast friends better? Im just curious as to what constitutes fast?

Grandpa 09-27-2013 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by re-rx7 (Post 51666)
Its an old Supra was a 7m. Pretty quick given the circumstances. Fast is relative anyways. MAybe I should have worded it as " for what the car is, it is quick"? Would that have suited you and your fast friends better? Im just curious as to what constitutes fast?

1000rw is a starting point for being fast. Anything above 1000rw are referred to "fast" or "mountain" cars. Anything below 750rw are referred to as "sandbox" cars. Anything between 800-1000rw are stuck out. Too fast for sandbox cars, but not even fast enough to be a camera car for "mountain" cars.

Junkie 09-27-2013 04:41 PM

lol @ a bunch of people with slow shit. Making "rules" on whats fast and not.

re-rx7 09-27-2013 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Junkie (Post 51671)
lol @ a bunch of people with slow shit. Making "rules" on whats fast and not.

LOL really dont think there are rules as to whats fast. The driver is whats fast. I thought sergios car was decent. Shit its an old supray with a 7m for god sakes.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.