View Single Post
Old 10-03-2012, 09:13 PM   #5
Eaglei532
Senior Member
 
Eaglei532's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North Dallas
Posts: 218
Default

Well after reading the post again, it did seem a little derogatory. What I meant is this, the different services have different definitions of rates certain medals.

This is the Difference in 2 recent citations:
- 1stSgt Brad Kasal: Navy Cross - 7 gunshot wounds, 40 peices of shrap, lost 60% of his blood, and put his body over E3s to take the wounds for them, all of this after he assaulted an enemy strong hold to get his boys out

http://www.leatherneck.com/forums/sh...or-His-Bravery

- SSGT Giunta: MOH - no real injuries, "saved" guys that he lost accountability for in the first place
http://www.army.mil/medalofhonor/giunta/profile.html

Its not meant to be a one service against the other argument, just a statement of fact that the two services define the conduct that rates certain medals in very different ways. But valor is valor, and i do not mean to negate the things that SSGT Giunta did, I just think things get skewed sometimes in larger services.
__________________
- 2003 SVT Cobra : Stock-ish
- 1997 SVT Cobra : Stock


RIP Chris Kyle

Last edited by Eaglei532; 10-03-2012 at 09:24 PM.
Eaglei532 is offline   Reply With Quote