Other Makes and Models Section for people who don't have 5.0s but still have badass cars. DFW 5.0s Welcomes everyone |
Sponsored Ads |
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
05-11-2014, 09:22 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: CENTEX
Age: 36
Posts: 378
|
Ram 1500 EcoDiesel
After doing a lot of reading, this is the best combination out there it seems. It is not going to be fast at all, but this thing will tow better than almost all gasser engines and will return better mileage.
I love my Tundra, but 15 MPG daily driving it and 8-9 towing with it are killer. Many people are getting 23-25 daily driving the Ram with a crew cab model, with many getting over 27 on the highway and around the 15 mark towing. It's a new engine choice, but paired with that ZF 8 speed seem to be a great pair.
Thinking about trading in my truck now. Anyone here have any experience or know anybody with this option?
__________________
- Jeff
_____________________________________________
2013 GT Premium|Brembo|MT82
ProCharger P1SC Stage 2|Full Suspension|New Plans: NA CJ Intake Manifold/OR H Pipe/3.73 Gears
Road Raced|Auto-X'd
Drag Raced|12.4s @ 119.7
Texas Mile|1/2 Mile: 140.3|1 Mile: 166.4|She had more in her!
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 09:24 PM
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
|
Originally Posted by Crimson600+HP
After doing a lot of reading, this is the best combination out there it seems. It is not going to be fast at all, but this thing will tow better than almost all gasser engines and will return better mileage.
I love my Tundra, but 15 MPG daily driving it and 8-9 towing with it are killer. Many people are getting 23-25 daily driving the Ram with a crew cab model, with many getting over 27 on the highway and around the 15 mark towing. It's a new engine choice, but paired with that ZF 8 speed seem to be a great pair.
Thinking about trading in my truck now. Anyone here have any experience or know anybody with this option?
|
The new Eco will be out soon. Also the option for that motor is just insane price wise. You will never recoup the cost.
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:10 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 119
|
Originally Posted by Crimson600+HP
Many people are getting 23-25 daily driving the Ram with a crew cab model, with many getting over 27 on the highway and around the 15 mark towing.
|
Originally Posted by re-rx7
You will never recoup the cost.
|
What is the price difference for the Dodge Ram 1500 Diesel?
Stating you cannot recoup the cost and not sharing any data is inconclusive?
__________________
07 TT GT500 w/misc supporting mods
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:05 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Mesquite
Age: 33
Posts: 466
|
Tune that sucker and you'd be really well off. I'm pretty sure its the same diesel they put in a couple jeeps like 3 years ago.
__________________
2008 C6 Boltons and Cam.
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:27 PM
|
#5
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
|
The option is around 3 grand. The diesal is where you never make up the cost. Diesal is considerably more then gasoline.
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:34 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Age: 34
Posts: 1,047
|
Originally Posted by re-rx7
The option is around 3 grand. The diesal is where you never make up the cost. Diesal is considerably more then gasoline.
|
Diesal?
__________________
The Queen:
2013 Race Red Mustang GT 6MT: 20" AMR's, GT500 AB, JBA LT's and ORX, SCT SF3/X3, MGW Short Throw, Some Carbon Wrap, Spoiler Delete, Eibach Sportlines, Koni STR.T's, BMR LCA's, BMR Relo Brackets, BMR UCA, Freedom Racing PHB, Maximum Motorsports CC Plates, BMR Safety loop, DSS Aluminum DS
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:42 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Buy an older cummins 6bt and just do a few of the standard mods to it. Will get you a little less mileage, but will tow much easier and probably better. Dodge's setup with the rear coil springs just doesn't seem tow happy to me.
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 10:58 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Age: 34
Posts: 1,047
|
Personally I wouldn't dump a Toyota, Ford or Chevy for a Mopar. I would wait and see what Ford brings to the table as far as gas mileage when they switch to the all aluminum body.
__________________
The Queen:
2013 Race Red Mustang GT 6MT: 20" AMR's, GT500 AB, JBA LT's and ORX, SCT SF3/X3, MGW Short Throw, Some Carbon Wrap, Spoiler Delete, Eibach Sportlines, Koni STR.T's, BMR LCA's, BMR Relo Brackets, BMR UCA, Freedom Racing PHB, Maximum Motorsports CC Plates, BMR Safety loop, DSS Aluminum DS
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 11:13 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
I'm really holding out for Ford to offer a small displacement diesel motor in the next generation superduty. It's known they have already dropped the 6.2, so I can easily see an adapted smaller diesel from their cab-over trucks probably make their way into the truck as an entry level motor under the 6.7
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 11:49 PM
|
#10
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
|
Originally Posted by JDMLOL
Diesal?
|
lol you got me
Originally Posted by JDMLOL
Personally I wouldn't dump a Toyota, Ford or Chevy for a Mopar. I would wait and see what Ford brings to the table as far as gas mileage when they switch to the all aluminum body.
|
this.
Originally Posted by DirtyD
I'm really holding out for Ford to offer a small displacement diesel motor in the next generation superduty. It's known they have already dropped the 6.2, so I can easily see an adapted smaller diesel from their cab-over trucks probably make their way into the truck as an entry level motor under the 6.7
|
NOt happening. There was a interview they did in motortrend not long back with Ford and they blatantly said they had no reason to offer a small diesel.
|
|
|
05-12-2014, 12:00 AM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by re-rx7
lol you got me
this.
NOt happening. There was a interview they did in motortrend not long back with Ford and they blatantly said they had no reason to offer a small diesel.
|
Market trend will change their mind. They already have a handful of small diesels to adapt for trucks, so only time will tell when they cave.
|
|
|
05-12-2014, 12:17 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 434
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
Market trend will change their mind. They already have a handful of small diesels to adapt for trucks, so only time will tell when they cave.
|
With the ecoboost truck outdoing all the competitors and ford v8 motors, and the price of gas vs diesel there would be know reason to consider a small diesel. They don't need to waste the money on R&D with the ecoboost hit on there hands.
__________________
Current:
2012 F150 FX2 Screw 3.5L Ecoboost
AFE Stage 2 CAI, AFE Atlas 4" catback, SSI93T4 Tune
mods to be put on:
MAK 3" Offroad downpipe, FR Intercooler, Meth kit, SSI T5 Tune
Totaled:
2013 GT/CS A6
Steeda CAI/ VMP Tune/GT500 AB/JEGS CAT DELETES/
STEEDA UCA/LCA'S/ EIBACH PRO KIT STRUTS/ FRPP K SPRINGS/ BMR PANHARD BAR / Shelby Razors 20's
|
|
|
05-12-2014, 11:06 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by PLASMAN
With the ecoboost truck outdoing all the competitors and ford v8 motors, and the price of gas vs diesel there would be know reason to consider a small diesel. They don't need to waste the money on R&D with the ecoboost hit on there hands.
|
The EB has been amazing, but it still doesn't stand up to a diesel IMO. And the EB hasn't really been out doing a lot of the gas V8 competition. If we lived in a higher elevation and not so close to see level, it would be the EB over any V8 hands down. But here there isn't much of a gap. I still stand behind the thought that Ford could succeed quite well with a small diesel in a light duty or 3/4 ton truck.
However, it appears the 4.5L V6 Powerstroke they were using in the LCF trucks, which is the ones I was referring to, was discontinued in 2010. Oh well.
|
|
|
05-11-2014, 11:46 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Keller
Age: 61
Posts: 1,006
|
After towing a 5500 pound load 2500 miles last week, and getting a high of 16 MPG and a low of 13.6, I'm seriously liking the 4.6 in the '09 F-150. Fuel is cheaper, and none of the associated maintenance of having a diesel powered truck.
__________________
|
|
|
05-12-2014, 12:44 AM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: CENTEX
Age: 36
Posts: 378
|
3k is easily recouped when the truck is a DD. The difference between 15 mpg on DD duty and 25 MPG is fairly significant. Plus, diesel is the price of premium fuel down here so I don't see the big difference in price. A 3/4 ton is too large for my applications and finding a 5.9 that hasn't been chopped up by a redneck is impossible/expensive.
The next gen diesels in 1/2 tons are going to be the 5.0L Cummins. 300 HP and 500 TQ is not going to get above 25 MPG on the highway either. Too big of an engine to be a fuel efficient & if it isn't FE you wine as well get a 3/4 ton. The only thing that will force Chevy or Ford to get in the diesel game is if Dodge makes a killing on this EcoDiesel, which in the first month 8,000 orders flooded the market and they can't keep up with the demand (they being VM who builds the engine).
Plus, real world application of the 3.5L ecoboost hasn't proved IMO that it saves gas at all during towing ( http://www.fuelly.com/car/ford/f-150/gas%20v6/truck). I think Ram hit the balance well and is the reason why I'm considering. Plus the interiors on the trucks (all top line models in every brand except Nissan) are pretty top notch.
__________________
- Jeff
_____________________________________________
2013 GT Premium|Brembo|MT82
ProCharger P1SC Stage 2|Full Suspension|New Plans: NA CJ Intake Manifold/OR H Pipe/3.73 Gears
Road Raced|Auto-X'd
Drag Raced|12.4s @ 119.7
Texas Mile|1/2 Mile: 140.3|1 Mile: 166.4|She had more in her!
Last edited by Crimson600+HP; 05-12-2014 at 12:46 AM.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|