Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > Performance

Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-23-2013, 04:28 PM   #1
Dominic Toretto
Senior Member
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 41
Posts: 1,896
Default

Read through the posts here. No one has specified what diameter tubing they are going with for such gains. Are we talking about 1 3/4s or 1 7/8s?

-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376

Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
Dominic Toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 05:01 PM   #2
Midnight11
El Presidente
 
Midnight11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
Default

1 7/8 or bust
__________________

2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED
HP-enough
4-0 vs Steve
Midnight11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 09:30 PM   #3
Rebelracer568
Senior Member
 
Rebelracer568's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sanger
Age: 34
Posts: 392
Default

1 7/8" on my car
__________________
2014 sterling gray 5.0 mustang gt. MT82, 3.55 gears with few mods
1973 mercury comet 347ci Jerico 4 speed tranny
1978 mercury Capri 2.8l German v6
Rebelracer568 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2013, 09:52 PM   #4
Dark Pony
Supporting Member
 
Dark Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Age: 36
Posts: 879
Default

Actually 1 7/8 are overkill on these cars. Keep in mind, they are only 302's...I do have 1 7/8 on min, but only because I got such a good deal on mine. I'm only $500 invested in LT's with my install included. 1 3/4 would be perfectly fine on these cars. As far as it "being worth it"...that's all relative. Boss IM's do nothing for these cars. They shift the power and up higher n the RPMs and force you to spin the motor upwards of 7800 RPMs to see max gains out of it. I saw 13 HP and lost 22 ft lbs of Tq. I know I gained HP and Tq with my LT's, so IMO LT's were a great investment. These two mods are the most highly debated mods and people are always going to differ in opinions. All it takes is money...
__________________
Dark Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 08:11 AM   #5
Dominic Toretto
Senior Member
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 41
Posts: 1,896
Default

Originally Posted by Dark Pony View Post
Actually 1 7/8 are overkill on these cars.
That's what I was thinking. That's why I wanted to pose the question.

-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376

Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
Dominic Toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 12:28 AM   #6
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Originally Posted by Dark Pony View Post
Actually 1 7/8 are overkill on these cars. Keep in mind, they are only 302's...I do have 1 7/8 on min, but only because I got such a good deal on mine. I'm only $500 invested in LT's with my install included. 1 3/4 would be perfectly fine on these cars. As far as it "being worth it"...that's all relative. Boss IM's do nothing for these cars. They shift the power and up higher n the RPMs and force you to spin the motor upwards of 7800 RPMs to see max gains out of it. I saw 13 HP and lost 22 ft lbs of Tq. I know I gained HP and Tq with my LT's, so IMO LT's were a great investment. These two mods are the most highly debated mods and people are always going to differ in opinions. All it takes is money...
I picked up more tq and hp when I switched from bbk 1 5/8 to American racing 1 7/8.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 06:15 PM   #7
Dark Pony
Supporting Member
 
Dark Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Age: 36
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
I picked up more tq and hp when I switched from bbk 1 5/8 to American racing 1 7/8.
With the same setup as before? Just a header swap? How much HP and TQ? It couldn't have been much.
__________________
Dark Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 10:12 AM   #8
Midnight11
El Presidente
 
Midnight11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
Default

i really dont see how its an overkill but to each his own...
__________________

2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED
HP-enough
4-0 vs Steve
Midnight11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 10:29 AM   #9
JOHNGT
Junior Member
 
JOHNGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Garland, tx
Age: 41
Posts: 21
Default

I have 1 5/8 American racing headers btw
__________________
2010 gt. Performance mods: ford racing hot rod cams, American racing longtube headers, 3" high flow catted American racing x-pipe, 3"piping back to borla type-s mufflers, ford racing k springs, Shelby sway bars, adjustable panhard bar, brembo shocks/struts, sumitomo 285/35/18 rear tires. cosmetic:gt4 replicataggered set, smoked raxiom headlights(galos off), raxiom tail lights.
JOHNGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 12:20 PM   #10
Doug1227
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 496
Default

^ You mean the same diameter as we all used to run on 250 HP Foxes 10 years ago?
__________________
2012 GT/CS KB2.8LC 596/487
Doug1227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 09:08 AM   #11
5PointSlow
Senior Member
 
5PointSlow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Mustang, Ok
Posts: 259
Default

I run the 1 7/8 SWs. Beside the O2 sensor issues (solved by relocating courtesy of true street. ) well worth the money.
__________________
2015 Comp Orange GT Premium Perfomance Pack

SOLD!
2012 Kona Blue GT Premium
Roush TVS/JLT Big Air
Stainless Works Long Tubes and catted X.
Magnaflow Competition Catback
AED Tuned
***Driver Mod***
10.88@134 on street tires
5PointSlow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 06:21 PM   #12
JDMLOL
Senior Member
 
JDMLOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Age: 33
Posts: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by 5PointSlow View Post
I run the 1 7/8 SWs. Beside the O2 sensor issues (solved by relocating courtesy of true street. ) well worth the money.
Was that because the front sensors were reading off of only one primary tube? My jbas are the same and im wondering if I need to relocate them to the collector.
__________________

The Queen:
2013 Race Red Mustang GT 6MT: 20" AMR's, GT500 AB, JBA LT's and ORX, SCT SF3/X3, MGW Short Throw, Some Carbon Wrap, Spoiler Delete, Eibach Sportlines, Koni STR.T's, BMR LCA's, BMR Relo Brackets, BMR UCA, Freedom Racing PHB, Maximum Motorsports CC Plates, BMR Safety loop, DSS Aluminum DS
JDMLOL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 10:06 PM   #13
Toby
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 36
Posts: 459
Default

Originally Posted by JDMLOL View Post
Was that because the front sensors were reading off of only one primary tube? My jbas are the same and im wondering if I need to relocate them to the collector.
no his were aimed to where water would collect in the sensor and kill it.

IMO putting the oxygen sensor in a primary tube is the dumbest idea i have seen. Not only does it restrict flow on that cylinder, it does not give an accurate reading back to the computer.
Toby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 10:20 PM   #14
JDMLOL
Senior Member
 
JDMLOL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Age: 33
Posts: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by Toby View Post
no his were aimed to where water would collect in the sensor and kill it.

IMO putting the oxygen sensor in a primary tube is the dumbest idea i have seen. Not only does it restrict flow on that cylinder, it does not give an accurate reading back to the computer.
Im considering throwing extensions on and moving them. I guess I'd need a custom tune though. Im like you, idk why they did that either because it doesnt get a reading from the other cylinders so if they have issues it wouldn't throw a MIL.
__________________

The Queen:
2013 Race Red Mustang GT 6MT: 20" AMR's, GT500 AB, JBA LT's and ORX, SCT SF3/X3, MGW Short Throw, Some Carbon Wrap, Spoiler Delete, Eibach Sportlines, Koni STR.T's, BMR LCA's, BMR Relo Brackets, BMR UCA, Freedom Racing PHB, Maximum Motorsports CC Plates, BMR Safety loop, DSS Aluminum DS
JDMLOL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2013, 09:36 AM   #15
Dark Pony
Supporting Member
 
Dark Pony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Age: 36
Posts: 879
Default

Originally Posted by JDMLOL View Post
Im considering throwing extensions on and moving them. I guess I'd need a custom tune though. Im like you, idk why they did that either because it doesnt get a reading from the other cylinders so if they have issues it wouldn't throw a MIL.
I have an extra one if you need it
__________________
Dark Pony is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump