Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > Performance

Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-12-2013, 07:24 PM   #16
Yagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yagermeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
Default

Already shift at 7750 for 36,000 miles and 180 passes so no changes for me until I upgrade the springs
__________________
2010 GT500
Yagermeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 08:06 PM   #17
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Originally Posted by Yagermeister View Post
People are seeing 20-40 HP and that IS attractive to me for $500 upgrade charge
Over the boss?
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 08:37 PM   #18
Yagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yagermeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
Default

Yes look around...Boss cars hover in the 420-430 range and CJ intake cars are 450-490 depending on fuel and throttle body and cai choice
__________________
2010 GT500
Yagermeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 09:25 PM   #19
Dominic Toretto
Senior Member
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 41
Posts: 1,896
Default

Originally Posted by Yagermeister View Post
Yes look around...Boss cars hover in the 420-430 range and CJ intake cars are 450-490 depending on fuel and throttle body and cai choice
I knew this mod had to have some merit.

-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376

Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
Dominic Toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2013, 09:42 PM   #20
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Yagermeister View Post
Already shift at 7750 for 36,000 miles and 180 passes so no changes for me until I upgrade the springs
Yeah, that's what I was wondering. I didn't remember you doing any valve train upgrades, but just asking anyways. It's going to be sweet.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 10:38 AM   #21
Midnight11
El Presidente
 
Midnight11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
Default

brent is my hero
__________________

2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED
HP-enough
4-0 vs Steve
Midnight11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 11:14 AM   #22
Yagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yagermeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
Default

Originally Posted by DirtyD View Post
Yeah, that's what I was wondering. I didn't remember you doing any valve train upgrades, but just asking anyways. It's going to be sweet.
Cant wait Derek!





Originally Posted by Midnight11 View Post
brent is my hero
Awww Nic...when I get rich I'll be your rich uncle in law three times removed
__________________
2010 GT500
Yagermeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 12:31 PM   #23
TrueStreetTim
DFW5.0s Preferred Vendor
 
TrueStreetTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: McKinney
Posts: 676
Default

Haven't had the plenum in our hands yet (or one on our dyno), what's the reported torque losses coming out to?
TrueStreetTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 12:38 PM   #24
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by TrueStreetTim View Post
Haven't had the plenum in our hands yet (or one on our dyno), what's the reported torque losses coming out to?
From what I think I remember seeing on SVTP, TQ losses are around the same as the Boss....I'll have to go back and find it....but I don't feel like it.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 12:44 PM   #25
TrueStreetTim
DFW5.0s Preferred Vendor
 
TrueStreetTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: McKinney
Posts: 676
Default

Originally Posted by DirtyD View Post
From what I think I remember seeing on SVTP, TQ losses are around the same as the Boss....I'll have to go back and find it....but I don't feel like it.
Damn you, D!

I'm assuming torque losses beyond that of a BOSS? Basically an overgrown BOSS that picks up peak but drops TQ only more in both directions?

Last edited by TrueStreetTim; 09-13-2013 at 01:07 PM.
TrueStreetTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 12:57 PM   #26
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by TrueStreetTim View Post
Damn you, D!

I'm assuming torque losses beyond that of a BOSS? Basically an overgrown BOSS that picks up peak but drops TQ only more in both directions?
Pretty much. There is no way it makes the power that Brent thinks it does. 50hp over what a Boss does? He's trying to say people are picking up 70hp with just an intake change in a NA platform. LOL, no way.

Only a turbo car will truly be able to benefit from the CJ intake.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 01:28 PM   #27
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

From what I understood, the intake only really picked up more power when spinning to the motor up to the 8100 mark like the CJ motor...which obviously can't be done on a stock GT.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 01:46 PM   #28
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
Pretty much. There is no way it makes the power that Brent thinks it does. 50hp over what a Boss does? He's trying to say people are picking up 70hp with just an intake change in a NA platform. LOL, no way.

Only a turbo car will truly be able to benefit from the CJ intake.
Yeah I was going to say that but I didn't want to start shit cause I know how sensitive people are when I disagree with them.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 02:08 PM   #29
Yagermeister
Senior Member
 
Yagermeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
Default

All the cars that have this intake are in the 450-490 range SAE with full boltons some with e85 some with 91/93. You pickup HP and TQ across the board and lose no more TQ than what the Boss already lost. The key is NOT the intake but rather the throttle body choice and the cold air tube and MAF...I chose the largest of both
__________________
2010 GT500
Yagermeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2013, 02:17 PM   #30
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by Yagermeister View Post
All the cars that have this intake are in the 450-490 range SAE with full boltons some with e85 some with 91/93. You pickup HP and TQ across the board and lose no more TQ than what the Boss already lost. The key is NOT the intake but rather the throttle body choice and the cold air tube and MAF...I chose the largest of both
I'm interested in seeing your results. That kind of power with bolt ons and a stock longblock would be impressive. The problem with it is having to rev the hell out of the stock valvetrain. In a couple more years I bet we start seeing a lot of cars running the Boss intakes spinning them in the upper 7k range starting to have valve/springs issues.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump