| General Discussions Discuss anything in general about your 5.0 Mustang that doesn't belong within the other categories here. |
| Sponsored Ads |
|
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
10-26-2012, 01:25 PM
|
#16
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Why not just go for a 6.7 PSD? With incentives and model year end Ford/dealer rebates, you could get a loaded F350 that will get you better mileage than any of those vehicles, and with with a few pennies in it, will rain coal on all other cars.
You can't go wrong with a diesel.
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:27 PM
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 155
|
Don't want a diesel
Lol and no corvettes - truck / SUV
__________________
2012 Mustang 5.0 |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:28 PM
|
#18
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 155
|
I started this thread because I know once car is back to stock I'm impatient and will move fast so the next week or 2 I have my hands tied and have Alittle time to think haha - not by choice
__________________
2012 Mustang 5.0 |
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:29 PM
|
#19
|
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
I think it depends on what your plans are for the truck.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:30 PM
|
#20
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
I would choose a new F150 then.
But honestly, the 5.0 in an FX4 would be comparable to the Ecoboost FX4.
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:32 PM
|
#21
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Do you plan on ever using the 4WD if you get it?
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:37 PM
|
#22
|
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
|
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough  4-0 vs Steve
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:41 PM
|
#23
|
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
I'm sorry Caleb, you know I've got nothing but love for ya bro, but concrete cowboy trucks are truely some of the lamest rides out there. lmao!
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:42 PM
|
#24
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by Midnight11
|
That truck is legit.
But LOL @ the comment about "low miles". It's a 6 year old truck with ~72k. That's about average. If it had like 12k, that's another story.
Hopefully it's got some go fast goodies on it.
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:42 PM
|
#25
|
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
|
pretty sure thats low miles for a diesel
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough 4-0 vs Steve
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:46 PM
|
#26
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by Steve
I'm sorry Caleb, you know I've got nothing but love for ya bro, but concrete cowboy trucks are truely some of the lamest rides out there. lmao!
|
Agreed. Coming from a country boy, it kind of irritates me how all these frat fags up here throw 6"+ lifts and 35"+ tires on a truck and then laugh when you ask if they've ever wheeled in it, or reply with something about a dirt road.
Do not buy a 4x4 if it will never go off the concrete/asphalt. Get a 2wd. You gain back the power lost from the TC, plus they are typically [numerically] lower geared for better MPG.
I think you should get a regular cab F150 2wd with a 5.0 in it. Easily a Gen 3 Lightning.
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:48 PM
|
#27
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by Midnight11
pretty sure thats low miles for a diesel
|
Roughly 12k/year. That's about avg. Plus, he may have not had the speedo corrected after the tires. Never know.
My dad has a 2001 with ~135k last I checked. And it's been on many road trips.
My truck was a 2001 as well, with ~182k. That's a lot of miles.
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:51 PM
|
#28
|
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
|
crap now i want a truck...
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough 4-0 vs Steve
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:51 PM
|
#29
|
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by Midnight11
|
Do not get the 6.0 psd.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2012, 01:51 PM
|
#30
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Join the party.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
