Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > Photos & Videos > Foxbody 5.0s

Foxbody 5.0s For the original 5.0s that started it all


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-03-2013, 08:17 PM   #10
blownaltered
I have a small penis
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Making Steve my bitch since 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by Toby View Post
I will agree the ls gets better mileage, but apples to apples they cost about the same to build with similar hp results. I have built a bunch of both, my ls1 in the truck actually ended up costing more then My 347 in the mustang. I doubt he is much worried about fuel mileage if he wants a big hp car. It's is nice but doesn't always come with the territory. Different strokes man.

A short stoke 347 with the proper cam, heads, intake with a little boost from that monster blower will easily make 600-700 and drive smooth as can be.
What rods and pistons would you use with a short stroke 347? Would that be a 331 rod with the bigger 363 pistons?
blownaltered is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump