Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > Performance

Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-13-2013, 11:28 AM   #31
46Tbird
Senior Member
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
Default

Originally Posted by Steve View Post
You're talking about something you have no clue about.You're speaking out of turn on something you're taking at face value from board nonsense. Mind your own business, Danny.
You always seem to be testy and grumpy lately.
__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
46Tbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 11:30 AM   #32
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
You always seem to be testy and grumpy lately.
DFWM must be slow if you are trolling over here. lol
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 11:51 AM   #33
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

It's too early for me to get into detail of my car in this thread.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 11:54 AM   #34
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
It's too early for me to get into detail of my car in this thread.
Go have a beer, bowl a few frames, then get back to us. LOL
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 11:59 AM   #35
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by DirtyD View Post
Go have a beer, bowl a few frames, then get back to us. LOL
Jeff is a hack cranker who can't get it done without stripped backends.





lmao. I bet Jeff is the only other person who gets it.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:01 PM   #36
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Jeff is a hack cranker who can't get it done without stripped backends.





lmao. I bet Jeff is the only other person who gets it.
I know that's some sort of bowling talk, but it sounds dirty. Haha
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:01 PM   #37
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

That's pretty much the shot out here at Nationals. It's 41 feet with dry back ends and then single and doubles is 39 feet long. Talk about a lot of over/under out here. But I haven't bowled yet that's just what I've seen so far.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:05 PM   #38
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
That's pretty much the shot out here at Nationals. It's 41 feet with dry back ends and then single and doubles is 39 feet long. Talk about a lot of over/under out here. But I haven't bowled yet that's just what I've seen so far.
Until you get all the hacks trying to play deep tearing up the heads creating a spotty reverse block. By the end of the set you'll find yourself standing all the way left pitching it over the ditch just to find a spot. I hated Nationals because of that shit. Having to play that deep I always end up hanging the corners. Hopefully you can cash decently and make some up for it in the brackets.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:08 PM   #39
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Well enough with the bowling talk. Lets get back to car stuff.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:17 PM   #40
re-rx7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
Default

Originally Posted by Toby View Post
This could not be farther from the truth. Not a single part on jeffs build is from jpc. There is not even a single part the same as what jpc uses. jeffs car would make much more power, but it is setup with the intention of using nitrous. We could have made a few changes to make over 500 rwhp n/a but it would not have been safe to spray the nitrous. Also on another note, we dynoed a car recently that had wheels similar to jeffs wheels. The car made 408 rwhp, we put a set of stock wheels and tires we had at the shop on the rear, and the car made 428 rwhp with NOTHING else changed!!! Just goes to show how much "power" you lose with heavy wheels and tires, hince the variation in ''dyno'' numbers you will see.


Jeffs car is a beast for what it is, anyone that disagrees, has no idea what they are talking about. 479 hp to the tires with approx 20% power loss to the tires put him around 574 hp to the flywheel. That is 1.824 hp per ci. That is a huge amount of power I don't care what anyone says!!!
Great post about wheel weight and how they affect the car. That why I'm tryna stay stock 18's or at least stock weight
re-rx7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:51 PM   #41
Phuck Phace
My Stapler!
 
Phuck Phace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dtown
Posts: 1,928
Default

Originally Posted by re-rx7 View Post
Great post about wheel weight and how they affect the car. That why I'm tryna stay stock 18's or at least stock weight
13" Daytons FTW.
__________________

2012 GT/CS
93 Cobra
Phuck Phace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 12:58 PM   #42
Dan12GT
Senior Member
 
Dan12GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Roanoke, Texas
Age: 39
Posts: 818
Default

Originally Posted by re-rx7 View Post
Great post about wheel weight and how they affect the car. That why I'm tryna stay stock 18's or at least stock weight
The stock wheels are not very light either
__________________

Airaid CAI | Borla S-Type Catback | Amsoil 10w30 and MTG Trans. Fluid
382hp 387ft/lb | 1/4: 12.9 @ 112mph
Dan12GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 01:04 PM   #43
GTRacerX
Senior Member
 
GTRacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arlington, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by re-rx7 View Post
Great post about wheel weight and how they affect the car. That why I'm tryna stay stock 18's or at least stock weight
Wow I didn't realize wheel weight could make that big a difference! I'm shopping around for some 20s right now but can't find anything on weight. Is there a thread about popular wheels and their weight?
GTRacerX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 01:17 PM   #44
Luke
Senior Member
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Saginaw
Age: 38
Posts: 903
Default

Originally Posted by GTRacerX View Post
Wow I didn't realize wheel weight could make that big a difference! I'm shopping around for some 20s right now but can't find anything on weight. Is there a thread about popular wheels and their weight?
One of the 5.0 mags had an article about it. They put Weld RTS' on the front and lost a tenth with no other changes
Luke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 02:12 PM   #45
GTRacerX
Senior Member
 
GTRacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arlington, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by Luke View Post
One of the 5.0 mags had an article about it. They put Weld RTS' on the front and lost a tenth with no other changes
Makes sense I just don't want to be running around town looking like I'm driving to the track lol. I'm looking at the style wheel every other 5.0 owner has on there car the Avant Garde M310s or something similar. Again just don't know how much the 20s weigh?
GTRacerX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump