| General Discussions Discuss anything in general about your 5.0 Mustang that doesn't belong within the other categories here. |
| Sponsored Ads |
|
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
06-06-2013, 10:52 AM
|
#1
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
|
dynoing the car today
Getting her dynoed to get baseline numbers before the CAI & tune arrive tomorrow. Right now it has magna flow axle back and replaced stock 3.31 gears for 3.55s. Neither of which should make any differences if at all. Any guesses of the numbers?
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 11:25 AM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
|
377/360
__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 11:26 AM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
|
Auto or stick and where you dynoing
__________________
2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 11:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
|
Originally Posted by 03MachMe
Auto or stick and where you dynoing
|
Stick, dynoing at Gear heads performance in Arlington. Your numbers in your signature, were those stock?
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:02 PM
|
#5
|
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
370/370
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:10 PM
|
#6
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 380/370 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
Last edited by DirtyD; 06-06-2013 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:17 PM
|
#7
|
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 370/360 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
|
SAE numbers are always lower then STD numbers.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:25 PM
|
#8
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
SAE numbers are always lower then STD numbers.
|
Nevermind, you are correct. I was thinking unfactored. My bad.
Last edited by DirtyD; 06-06-2013 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:32 PM
|
#9
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 380/370 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
|
Let's hope so
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 01:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
|
386/380
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough  4-0 vs Steve
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 01:12 PM
|
#11
|
|
My Stapler!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dtown
Posts: 1,928
|
420
__________________
2012 GT/CS
93 Cobra |
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 01:34 PM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
|
Re: dynoing the car today
Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang
Stick, dynoing at Gear heads performance in Arlington. Your numbers in your signature, were those stock?
|
Yep only mod was gt500 axle backs.
I say 383/379
__________________
2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 02:31 PM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
So what's the verdict?
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 02:32 PM
|
#14
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
|
Well the results are in. 358hp, 338tq with 74 degrees outside And 70% humidity -- must add that's just with 3.55 gears and magna flow axle back .. CAI & Tune will arrive and be put on the car tomorrow.
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#15
|
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 380/370 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
|
What is with your obsession with the settings on the numbers? I don't get it. The only numbers that matter are on the track. Dyno numbers do not equate performance numbers, it's simply peak numbers. The dyno is only a tool to tune a car not measure performance. I don't get this younger generations obsession with peak numbers. 
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
