Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > Performance

Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2013, 02:05 PM   #31
thelandshark
Senior Member
 
thelandshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: flowermound
Age: 36
Posts: 148
Default

I think ur tune was a Lil weak jay is a good racer don't get me wrong but I don't see that intake killing u that much k&n makes very good parts maybe get a new tune and retry are have jay load his race tune an see what happens
__________________
2014 3.7 roush axel back jlt cai makeing hopefully 260.5hp
2013 ford focus st race red.
thelandshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 02:07 PM   #32
Oxford14Stang
Senior Member
 
Oxford14Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
Default

Derek, my car is a 14' thank you very much :-) lol. Had to say it. Second.. great runs again. Wasn't much of a differences but after looking at your intake design I personally don't like it. I choose steeda because I called bama and asked them what they made/seen more power out of, steeda or the jlt. They told me their stock 13' dynoed 370hp after steeda and bama tune it dynoed 408hp with jlt and bama tune it dynoed 403 so really no difference. Could of simply been IAT were hotter. So I personally would run either or over the k&n. Also I've never heard of JPC Racing so I can't really say anything about their tunes. Just don't see ppl tunning them. I have been extreamly pleased withy bama tune(performance, only ran race on the track) and would support them in an argument(to a point bahhhaa)
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82

Oxford14Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 02:18 PM   #33
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by thelandshark View Post
I think ur tune was a Lil weak jay is a good racer don't get me wrong but I don't see that intake killing u that much k&n makes very good parts maybe get a new tune and retry are have jay load his race tune an see what happens
Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang View Post
Derek, my car is a 14' thank you very much :-) lol. Had to say it. Second.. great runs again. Wasn't much of a differences but after looking at your intake design I personally don't like it. I choose steeda because I called bama and asked them what they made/seen more power out of, steeda or the jlt. They told me their stock 13' dynoed 370hp after steeda and bama tune it dynoed 408hp with jlt and bama tune it dynoed 403 so really no difference. Could of simply been IAT were hotter. So I personally would run either or over the k&n. Also I've never heard of JPC Racing so I can't really say anything about their tunes. Just don't see ppl tunning them. I have been extreamly pleased withy bama tune(performance, only ran race on the track) and would support them in an argument(to a point bahhhaa)
Haha. I'm stupid. Haha.

Those dynos were in STD I'm sure, so SAE would've shown less of a gain, so it was just a marketing scheme to inflate numbers a little more.

JPC is kind of a East coast equivalent to AED. JPC are well known in the community, and have some of the fastest Coyotes being races at the strip.

As for the K&N design, since I have the same size area around the MAF location, I don't think I'm getting an advantage with more air like you are with the larger tube, which again is back to the "no tune required" ordeal.

I really think had I not missed 5th on the first run, that would've been a damn close one.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 03:13 PM   #34
Oxford14Stang
Senior Member
 
Oxford14Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
Default

It was a damn close run. I was asking thelandshark who I work with after he saw the video I was wondering why that first run we were neck and neck and the others I pulled. Didn't make sense. Also towards the end of the video there's a run where you pulled than I pulled it back in. a lot of unanswered questions but thats what we get for racing on the streets with no slips to see what we did.
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82

Oxford14Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 03:18 PM   #35
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang View Post
It was a damn close run. I was asking thelandshark who I work with after he saw the video I was wondering why that first run we were neck and neck and the others I pulled. Didn't make sense. Also towards the end of the video there's a run where you pulled than I pulled it back in. a lot of unanswered questions but thats what we get for racing on the streets with no slips to see what we did.
Yeah, that's why I'm puzzled. It may have been the temp, it may not have been. Who knows. I think getting another matchup in when it's cooler may tell a little better story.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 04:08 PM   #36
Oxford14Stang
Senior Member
 
Oxford14Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
Default

Sounds great
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82

Oxford14Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 04:31 PM   #37
Rebelracer568
Senior Member
 
Rebelracer568's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sanger
Age: 34
Posts: 392
Default

I watched the videos. I notice in videos your car pulls then like hits wall and jay pulls away. I would look into your tune. I know jpc has some of baddest na coyotes around.
__________________
2014 sterling gray 5.0 mustang gt. MT82, 3.55 gears with few mods
1973 mercury comet 347ci Jerico 4 speed tranny
1978 mercury Capri 2.8l German v6
Rebelracer568 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 04:37 PM   #38
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Rebelracer568 View Post
I watched the videos. I notice in videos your car pulls then like hits wall and jay pulls away. I would look into your tune. I know jpc has some of baddest na coyotes around.
I don't think it's my shifting. I was having clean shifts except for the lockouts in 5th and 3rd.

The issues are definitely occuring in the higher RPM. That is why I think my timing may be the culprit.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 04:59 PM   #39
Rebelracer568
Senior Member
 
Rebelracer568's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sanger
Age: 34
Posts: 392
Default

Yea your shifts looked good in the video. I would call jpc and see if they can send you a updated tune. I have some bama tunes I can send you. There for a c&l cai intake if you possibly wanna try it
__________________
2014 sterling gray 5.0 mustang gt. MT82, 3.55 gears with few mods
1973 mercury comet 347ci Jerico 4 speed tranny
1978 mercury Capri 2.8l German v6
Rebelracer568 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 05:09 PM   #40
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Tune will be too rich since it's for a larger intake, and also won't be for my car since they are computer/ecu matched.

I'm going to get with JPC when they get back in the office next week. I don't have a laptop to log my current tune though, so that doesn't help.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2013, 06:40 PM   #41
Oxford14Stang
Senior Member
 
Oxford14Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
Default

Derek, I used fords IDS and while I drove thelandshark monitored and recorded my a/f (my performance tune) at idle was 14.2-14.3 under wide open throttle it was 12.29 so I'm running rich on top end.. better rich than lean I always say
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82

Oxford14Stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 12:09 AM   #42
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang View Post
Derek, I used fords IDS and while I drove thelandshark monitored and recorded my a/f (my performance tune) at idle was 14.2-14.3 under wide open throttle it was 12.29 so I'm running rich on top end.. better rich than lean I always say
Can you check timing with that as well?
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 12:37 AM   #43
Mrjeremyt
Senior Member
 
Mrjeremyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Cedar Hill
Age: 36
Posts: 220
Default

I know the IDS can watch timing...
__________________
'13 5.0 in deep impact blue, "The Blue Goose"
A few mods, just a daily.

94 F150 302
New project, thinking built, procharger, powerglide, tubbed, super sleeper
Mrjeremyt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 01:20 AM   #44
03MachMe
Senior Member
 
03MachMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
Default

I think you are WAY over thinking one race with another car
__________________

2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
03MachMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2013, 09:30 AM   #45
re-rx7
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
Default

Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang View Post
at idle was 14.2-14.3 under wide open throttle it was 12.29
but...bu.. its a bama tune.?
re-rx7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump