Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club

Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club (http://www.dfw50s.com/index.php)
-   General Discussions (http://www.dfw50s.com/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   400 ft lb at N/A (http://www.dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=2250)

Grandpa 07-17-2013 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT (Post 40832)
Yea, cause you don't even own is consider fast. People with 70k dollars plus cars with 30k plus into it and you rode in them is fast. Man anything with 700 rwhp is fast.


That's your opinion, I disagree.

My junk is slow and always will be. I'm okay with it. lol

BLK2012GT 07-17-2013 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT (Post 40833)
That's your opinion, I disagree.

My junk is slow and always will be. I'm okay with it. lol

Your junk is slow cause its basically stock. I said 700 rwhp plus is fast. And god damnit why do you have to derail every thread.

Phuck Phace 07-17-2013 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT (Post 40832)
Man anything with 700 rwhp is fast.

I disagree.

BLK2012GT 07-17-2013 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Phuck Phace (Post 40838)
I disagree.

What needs to be lower for you?:happy175:

Grandpa 07-17-2013 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT (Post 40822)
Ok Steve. Smh

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT (Post 40826)
Not this shit again.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT (Post 40834)
Your junk is slow cause its basically stock. I said 700 rwhp plus is fast. And god damnit why do you have to derail every thread.

You have an accountability issue there, Jeff. I believe you started the derailment with the top two posts and David came along fueling it.



Back on topic -


Yes, 400tq is very common. I think it really depends on what kind of dyno you were on. Some are more generous than others.

BLK2012GT 07-17-2013 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT (Post 40843)
You have an accountability issue there, Jeff. I believe you started the derailment with the top two posts and David came along fueling it.



Back on topic -


Yes, 400tq is very common. I think it really depends on what kind of dyno you were on. Some are more generous than others.

Yeah I said after you and Nic. Do you have selective reading?

Grandpa 07-17-2013 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT (Post 40846)
Yeah I said after you and Nic. Do you have selective reading?

I posted my numbers and agreed with Nic. You just don't like my opinion. That is fine, get over it and let the thread go on.

BLK2012GT 07-17-2013 05:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT (Post 40850)
I posted my numbers and agreed with Nic. You just don't like my opinion. That is fine, get over it and let the thread go on.

And when I post something you guys always post something afterwards. So do what you preach.

DirtyD 07-17-2013 05:12 PM

It's hard to compare dyno numbers between cars unless they were both dynoed on the same day, and dyno, with as close to the same exact weather as possible, and the dyno tech hit the trigger at the exact right moment on both cars.

Just too many factors to come into play. (You like this post don't you Steve? Lol)

It also depends on how the TQ values are determined. A calculated TQ value done from the load on the dyno (like Brooks') may be way off from one calculated by RPM sensor and such like TS does.

46Tbird 07-17-2013 05:16 PM

Car 1 and Car 2 weigh the same, have the same gearing, same tires, and twin brothers driving.

Car 1 makes 400tq at 2500rpm and 400hp at 6500

Car 2 makes 375tq at 2500rpm and 425hp at 6500

Car 2 wins the race every time, assuming the driver knows that you don't let the engine drop to 2500rpm during a race.

DirtyD 07-17-2013 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 46Tbird (Post 40866)
Car 1 and Car 2 weigh the same, have the same gearing, same tires, and twin brothers driving.

Car 1 makes 400tq at 2500rpm and 400hp at 6500

Car 2 makes 375tq at 2500rpm and 425hp at 6500

Car 2 wins the race every time, assuming the driver knows that you don't let the engine drop to 2500rpm during a race.

Are we talking about a dog or roll race? LOL

KungFuHamster 07-17-2013 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyD (Post 40860)
It's hard to compare dyno numbers between cars unless they were both dynoed on the same day, and dyno, with as close to the same exact weather as possible, and the dyno tech hit the trigger at the exact right moment on both cars.

Just too many factors to come into play. (You like this post don't you Steve? Lol)

It also depends on how the TQ values are determined. A calculated TQ value done from the load on the dyno (like Brooks') may be way off from one calculated by RPM sensor and such like TS does.

I get what your saying. But my car was was within 5-6 hp and 5 ft lb on Brooks' dyno on a hotter day, so I would consider that an accurate measure. I understand the variation between weather and dynos and what not and that of course, makes sense.

my thing is I believe a street car that makes 30 ft lb across the board will be faster than a car that makes 20 or so at the very top of the tach.

BLK2012GT 07-17-2013 05:22 PM

Wtf? Damn you guys know how to derail a thread. Lmao and by the way car two would win from a roll or dig.

jrhagen 07-17-2013 05:23 PM

I have over 400 tq

BLK2012GT 07-17-2013 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jrhagen (Post 40884)
I have over 400 tq

So do I even with the boss intake.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.