Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang |
Sponsored Ads |
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
07-28-2013, 07:38 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
|
Actually the CJ has an intake very similar to the Boss but moves the rpm range even higher
__________________
2010 GT500
|
|
|
07-28-2013, 08:35 PM
|
#2
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
|
Originally Posted by Yagermeister
Actually the CJ has an intake very similar to the Boss but moves the rpm range even higher
|
Exactly so you can be in the power band longer due to not staying in an RPM range as a road car would.
__________________
2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
|
|
|
07-28-2013, 09:02 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
|
From what I've heard is that the CJ intake didn't extend it but rather moved it so if the Boss was 5400-7800, the CJ is 5700- 8100 now.
__________________
2010 GT500
|
|
|
07-28-2013, 09:15 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
|
Originally Posted by Yagermeister
From what I've heard is that the CJ intake didn't extend it but rather moved it so if the Boss was 5400-7800, the CJ is 5700- 8100 now.
|
Hmm either way I'm sure the engineers at Ford are a lot smarter than I and know what would be best lol.
__________________
2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
|
|
|
07-28-2013, 11:13 PM
|
#5
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
|
There is a setting in the tune (10 second item you mentioned) from Ford that is easily bypassed in the tune. Make sure your tuner changes this no matter what you do to your car.
__________________
2010 GT500
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 12:39 PM
|
#6
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Age: 37
Posts: 879
|
And the Boss has the same issues. Believe it or not, the GT500 has the same issues with the TR6060. A lot of it has to do with the remote shifting.
__________________
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 12:40 PM
|
#7
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
|
stiffer motor mounts.
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 01:01 PM
|
#8
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Hmmmmmm don't have any problem with mine shifting at 8k rpms and before my build I was shifting at 7700 rpms.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 01:06 PM
|
#9
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Hmmmmmm don't have any problem with mine shifting at 8k rpms and before my build I was shifting at 7700 rpms.
|
Thats weird cause neither do I.
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 02:22 PM
|
#10
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 34
Posts: 3,367
|
Shifting over 7500 ftw!
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough 4-0 vs Steve
|
|
|
07-29-2013, 07:29 PM
|
#11
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Age: 37
Posts: 879
|
Everyone is not going to have the problem foos, but gear lockout is very common with remote shift transmissions.
Essentially, a remote shift transmission such as the MT82 and TR6060, are operated by shifter linkage outside the tail housing. The shifting mechanisms inside the transmission differ from a direct shift like a T56.
Direct shift transmissions such as the T56 have a fully enclosed tail shaft providing much more solidity and a "direct shift" from gear to gear. Again, the shifter mechanism is different.
The actual gear structure from a TR6060 and T56 are the same, but the way it's shifted is different. With a less supportive shifting mechanism, you are more prone to gear lockout at higher RPM's.
__________________
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 06:48 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
|
Everyone is saying HP gains of 7 w/ boss intake? I was under the impression that the boss intakes gave you upwards of 40ish? But sacrificed tq? Only thing I can think of is someone who has all bolt ons but uses the stock intake manifold post dyno #s or better yet track times and someone else do the same but who has a boss intake on their car.... we have any two people with the same mods other than intakes?
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 08:06 PM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Age: 36
Posts: 459
|
We just finished up doing some testing with a boss intake ported and unported. Results to follow but I will say that apples for apples nothing but a stock boss intake and a corrected tune you gaine around 5 hp up top but loose as much as 20 ft lbs down low. Now ported boss is another story...
Also we plan to do some testing with the stock intake ported and not. Keep your eyes peeled for the results!
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 09:48 PM
|
#14
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 38
Posts: 2,405
|
Ported stock im could be interesting.
|
|
|
07-30-2013, 09:50 PM
|
#15
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
I may be interested in ported stock as well
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|