General Discussions Discuss anything in general about your 5.0 Mustang that doesn't belong within the other categories here. |
Sponsored Ads |
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
06-06-2013, 12:10 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 380/370 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
Last edited by DirtyD; 06-06-2013 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:17 PM
|
#2
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 370/360 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
|
SAE numbers are always lower then STD numbers.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:25 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
SAE numbers are always lower then STD numbers.
|
Nevermind, you are correct. I was thinking unfactored. My bad.
Last edited by DirtyD; 06-06-2013 at 12:30 PM.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 12:32 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 35
Posts: 561
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 380/370 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
|
Let's hope so
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 02:35 PM
|
#5
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
With the humidity and heat this morning, your STD will be around 380/370 +/- 5 for both
SAE numbers will be corrected to around 375/365 +/- 5
My dyno numbers in my sig were only GT500 ABs and 3.55s. You should be pretty damn close to what I made.
|
What is with your obsession with the settings on the numbers? I don't get it. The only numbers that matter are on the track. Dyno numbers do not equate performance numbers, it's simply peak numbers. The dyno is only a tool to tune a car not measure performance. I don't get this younger generations obsession with peak numbers.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 02:47 PM
|
#6
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang
Well the results are in. 358hp, 338tq with 74 degrees outside And 70% humidity -- must add that's just with 3.55 gears and magna flow axle back .. CAI & Tune will arrive and be put on the car tomorrow.
|
Dang, those are almost numbers from an Auto. Did they give you a print out of the dyno graph? Wonder what type of dyno it is.
Originally Posted by Steve
What is with your obsession with the settings on the numbers? I don't get it. The only numbers that matter are on the track. Dyno numbers do not equate performance numbers, it's simply peak numbers. The dyno is only a tool to tune a car not measure performance. I don't get this younger generations obsession with peak numbers. 
|
All I did was just give him an estimate in both corrected forms. That's all. He asked about PEAK numbers, I answered his question. I know the track is where you put those numbers to the test, troll.
I don't get why you get so damn uptight about it.
Last edited by DirtyD; 06-06-2013 at 02:50 PM.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 03:11 PM
|
#7
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
Dang, those are almost numbers from an Auto. Did they give you a print out of the dyno graph? Wonder what type of dyno it is.
All I did was just give him an estimate in both corrected forms. That's all. He asked about PEAK numbers, I answered his question. I know the track is where you put those numbers to the test, troll.
I don't get why you get so damn uptight about it. 
|
I'm not uptight about it, you arguement just doesn't make any sense. Grilling someone over STD or SAE doesn't really matter. Depending on the air, temp, humidity or whatever else those numbers are nullified on any given day. Manual or auto, big convertor/small convertor etc. There is so many ways that can be manipulated it's crazy.
What matters is performance and having all the parts in a set up that work together in a efficient manner. A car make numbers to the moon, but it doesn't use them with the proper powerband, gearing etc for how it's intended on being used, then the numbers are useless.
How many times have you seen a car make really low numbers, but down some crazy ET times at the track? It's because the combo works together.
The same can be said for some high number dyno queens - why is it they can spin the rollers to a crazy number, but yet they get out on the street and get drug dirty by cars making much less? Because the setup doesn't work.
That is the point I'm making to you. The ONLY numbers that matter on a dyno is the A/F while tuning.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 03:21 PM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by Steve
I'm not uptight about it, you arguement just doesn't make any sense. Grilling someone over STD or SAE doesn't really matter. Depending on the air, temp, humidity or whatever else those numbers are nullified on any given day. Manual or auto, big convertor/small convertor etc. There is so many ways that can be manipulated it's crazy.
What matters is performance and having all the parts in a set up that work together in a efficient manner. A car make numbers to the moon, but it doesn't use them with the proper powerband, gearing etc for how it's intended on being used, then the numbers are useless.
How many times have you seen a car make really low numbers, but down some crazy ET times at the track? It's because the combo works together.
The same can be said for some high number dyno queens - why is it they can spin the rollers to a crazy number, but yet they get out on the street and get drug dirty by cars making much less? Because the setup doesn't work.
That is the point I'm making to you. The ONLY numbers that matter on a dyno is the A/F while tuning.
|
Dude, what fucking argument are you talking about? I simple typed my guesses to his dyno numbers. Who gives a flying shit if I put down both STD and SAE? I wasn't grilling anyone. I'm over that fucking shit from the other day. But obvious you aren't because you bring it up every god damn chance you get. It's getting really fucking old.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 03:37 PM
|
#9
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
Dude, what fucking argument are you talking about? I simple typed my guesses to his dyno numbers. Who gives a flying shit if I put down both STD and SAE? I wasn't grilling anyone. I'm over that fucking shit from the other day. But obvious you aren't because you bring it up every god damn chance you get. It's getting really fucking old.
|
Dude, relax. Holy kneejerk reaction, Batman. lol.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 05:14 PM
|
#10
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 277
|
Originally Posted by Steve
What is with your obsession with the settings on the numbers? I don't get it. The only numbers that matter are on the track. Dyno numbers do not equate performance numbers, it's simply peak numbers. The dyno is only a tool to tune a car not measure performance. I don't get this younger generations obsession with peak numbers. 
|
I agree and disagree with you. a dyno is like you said a Tool...
I guess its the bench racer in me, but you can take a car making 900 rwhp with a very peaky power band and a car with 900 rwhp with a HUGE powerband and the one car will walk away from the other. That's why normally a 600 rwhp nitrous car will pull on a 600 rwhp Blower car. Its all in the power band.
since I like to see the delta.. I normally dyno my car at the same place.. and use SAE numbers because they are normally Lower.. most of the guys using STD numbers are to over inflate their numbers... I couldn't give a fuck about setting a record.. I want to know where my powerband starts and stops.
__________________
2008 C6 coupe BPU++ Tuned by sam.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 05:49 PM
|
#11
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by White_lightning
I agree and disagree with you. a dyno is like you said a Tool...
I guess its the bench racer in me, but you can take a car making 900 rwhp with a very peaky power band and a car with 900 rwhp with a HUGE powerband and the one car will walk away from the other. That's why normally a 600 rwhp nitrous car will pull on a 600 rwhp Blower car. Its all in the power band.
since I like to see the delta.. I normally dyno my car at the same place.. and use SAE numbers because they are normally Lower.. most of the guys using STD numbers are to over inflate their numbers... I couldn't give a fuck about setting a record.. I want to know where my powerband starts and stops.
|
I agree. The area under the curve will tell you how your car is going to pull an where to shift.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 06:02 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 277
|
Originally Posted by Steve
I agree. The area under the curve will tell you how your car is going to pull an where to shift.
|
but again.. its a tool.. I don't brag about dyno numbers.. hell I don't even like telling ppl the numbers.. but for example.. I dyno'ed all my blower combos on the same dyno. I have all my dyno files, so I could overlay them and see the exact power band difference between the old blower and the new one.
__________________
2008 C6 coupe BPU++ Tuned by sam.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 06:07 PM
|
#13
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by White_lightning
but again.. its a tool.. I don't brag about dyno numbers.. hell I don't even like telling ppl the numbers.. but for example.. I dyno'ed all my blower combos on the same dyno. I have all my dyno files, so I could overlay them and see the exact power band difference between the old blower and the new one.
|
Yup, I agree completely. Doing so allows you to tweak your set up and tune in a way that helps dialing in your car the correct way. Dyno numbers mean squat.
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 06:35 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 35
Posts: 561
|
Alright guys... newbie question. I've got no idea what the best way to post a video on here would be. I'm thinking upload it to my youtube channel and post link? Or is there a way that I can post it on here directly from my computer? For now, I'll post dyno pics of the car strapped and graph. Thanks for any help/pointers.
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
06-06-2013, 06:38 PM
|
#15
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by Oxford14Stang
Alright guys... newbie question. I've got no idea what the best way to post a video on here would be. I'm thinking upload it to my youtube channel and post link? Or is there a way that I can post it on here directly from my computer? For now, I'll post dyno pics of the car strapped and graph. Thanks for any help/pointers.
|
Upload it on Youtube. Then use the Youtube tab above the box where you reply like so [YT] [ /YT].
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|